Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261740AbVA3RZ5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jan 2005 12:25:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261743AbVA3RZ5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jan 2005 12:25:57 -0500 Received: from waste.org ([216.27.176.166]:53224 "EHLO waste.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261740AbVA3RZw (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jan 2005 12:25:52 -0500 Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 09:25:39 -0800 From: Matt Mackall To: Fruhwirth Clemens Cc: Fruhwirth Clemens , Andrew Morton , James Morris , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/04] Add LRW Message-ID: <20050130172539.GG2891@waste.org> References: <20050124115750.GA21883@ghanima.endorphin.org> <20050130000221.GA2955@waste.org> <1107085769.13776.11.camel@ghanima> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1107085769.13776.11.camel@ghanima> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 775 Lines: 21 On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 12:49:29PM +0100, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote: > > In fact, it's lowerCamelCase, that's intentional. The problem with mixing of naming styles is that it becomes difficult to remember what style is used where. Is it foo_bar_baz() or foobarbaz() or fooBarBaz() or FooBarBaz()? > > LRW and the GF(2**128) code is not configurable? > > No, it's a cipher mode. None of the modes is configurable. Is LRW an appropriate mode for anything but block storage? -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/