From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] Kconfig: cleanup input menu
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 18:39:37 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
Cc: linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501292320090.7662@scrub.home> <200501292307.55193.dtor_core@ameritech.net> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501301639171.30794@scrub.home>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501301639171.30794@scrub.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200501301839.37548.dtor_core@ameritech.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1145
Lines: 32

On Sunday 30 January 2005 10:45, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> 
> > Ok, what about making some submenus to manage number of options, like in
> > the patch below?
> 
> I'd rather move it to the bottom and the menus had no dependencies.
> Below is an alternative patch, which does a rather complete cleanup.

This one looks nice. I still think that hardware port support should go
first. My argument is:

When I go into a menu I explore option and submenus from top to bottom.
So I will see PS/2 or serial, and will go there and select what I need.
Then I will see that generic input layer is also needed for keyboard
and go there.

If generic layer is first one I select options I think are needed I could
skip over the HW I/O ports thinking that I already selected everything I
need as far as keyboard/mouse goes.

Does this make any sense?
 
-- 
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/