Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 23:19:03 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: I2C algorithm IDs
Message-ID: <20050201071903.GG20783@kroah.com>
References: <20050122174718.A27993@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050122174718.A27993@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 844
Lines: 23

On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 05:47:18PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> Greg,
> 
> Are I2C algorithm IDs supposed to be unique?  Do they have any meaning in
> reality at all?  If the answer is yes to either of these questions, the
> following should probably be resolved:

Yes, they are used in some places, and yes they do need to be unique.

> #define I2C_ALGO_PCA    0x150000        /* PCA 9564 style adapters      */
> #define I2C_ALGO_SIBYTE 0x150000        /* Broadcom SiByte SOCs         */

Thanks for pointing this out, I've gone and fixed this up and will send
the patch upward.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/