Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261409AbVBATQ1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:16:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261534AbVBATQ1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:16:27 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:18156 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261409AbVBATQP (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:16:15 -0500 Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 11:16:10 -0800 From: Dave Olien To: axboe@suse.de Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, agk@sourceware.org, dm-devel@redhat.com Subject: Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFC] [PATCH] bio-set patch on latest bk source tree Message-ID: <20050201191610.GA5112@osdl.org> References: <20050201010431.GA4244@osdl.org> <20050201075551.GC4137@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050201075551.GC4137@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 6350 Lines: 213 Jens, Thanks for the review! Your comments are quite right on all counts. Can't imagine how I slipped on that test for non-Null. I'll reduce the 512 bioset allocation sizes to 16, give it a test see where that goes. I think I'll need to change the scale to 4 as well. I'll apply your fixes, and submit to Andrew today. Dave On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 08:55:52AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31 2005, Dave Olien wrote: > > > > Hi, Jens, > > > > I sent you a patch for review about a week ago. Here is that same > > patch, applied to the latest bk kernel. Thanks in advance for the review > > Thanks Dave, I think we should queue this up with Andrew soonish. A few > minor things need fixing, though: > > > ===== drivers/md/dm.c 1.61 vs edited ===== > > --- 1.61/drivers/md/dm.c 2005-01-25 13:50:21 -08:00 > > +++ edited/drivers/md/dm.c 2005-01-31 11:37:27 -08:00 > > @@ -96,10 +96,16 @@ struct mapped_device { > > static kmem_cache_t *_io_cache; > > static kmem_cache_t *_tio_cache; > > > > +static struct bio_set *dm_set; > > + > > static int __init local_init(void) > > { > > int r; > > > > + dm_set = bioset_create(512, 512, 1); > > + if (!dm_set) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > You consistently use 512, that's a _lot_ of reserved bio's/vecs! For the > full range of bio_vec pools, that will eat quite a large piece of memory > per bio_set allocated. The idea with a mempool isn't to have a huge free > number of elements, but rather just a few to maintain progress with > memory pressure. I think this 512 should be heavily reduced. > > > static int zero_map(struct dm_target *ti, struct bio *bio, > > ===== fs/bio.c 1.73 vs edited ===== > > --- 1.73/fs/bio.c 2005-01-20 21:02:13 -08:00 > > +++ edited/fs/bio.c 2005-01-31 14:50:37 -08:00 > > @@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ > > > > #define BIO_POOL_SIZE 256 > > > > -static mempool_t *bio_pool; > > static kmem_cache_t *bio_slab; > > > > #define BIOVEC_NR_POOLS 6 > > @@ -40,11 +39,10 @@ static kmem_cache_t *bio_slab; > > #define BIO_SPLIT_ENTRIES 8 > > mempool_t *bio_split_pool; > > > > -struct biovec_pool { > > +struct biovec_slab { > > int nr_vecs; > > char *name; > > kmem_cache_t *slab; > > - mempool_t *pool; > > }; > > > > /* > > @@ -54,15 +52,32 @@ struct biovec_pool { > > */ > > > > #define BV(x) { .nr_vecs = x, .name = "biovec-"__stringify(x) } > > -static struct biovec_pool bvec_array[BIOVEC_NR_POOLS] = { > > +static struct biovec_slab bvec_slabs[BIOVEC_NR_POOLS] = { > > BV(1), BV(4), BV(16), BV(64), BV(128), BV(BIO_MAX_PAGES), > > }; > > #undef BV > > > > -static inline struct bio_vec *bvec_alloc(int gfp_mask, int nr, unsigned long *idx) > > +/* > > + * bio_set is used to allow other portions of the IO system to > > + * allocate their own private memory pools for bio and iovec structures. > > + * These memory pools in turn all allocate from the bio_slab > > + * and the bvec_slabs[]. > > + */ > > +struct bio_set { > > + mempool_t *bio_pool; > > + mempool_t *bvec_pools[BIOVEC_NR_POOLS]; > > +}; > > + > > +/* > > + * fs_bio_set is the bio_set containing bio and iovec memory pools used by > > + * IO code that does not need private memory pools. > > + */ > > +static struct bio_set *fs_bio_set; > > + > > +static inline struct bio_vec *bvec_alloc_bs(int gfp_mask, int nr, unsigned long *idx, struct bio_set *bs) > > { > > - struct biovec_pool *bp; > > struct bio_vec *bvl; > > + struct biovec_slab *bp; > > > > /* > > * see comment near bvec_array define! > > @@ -80,26 +95,27 @@ static inline struct bio_vec *bvec_alloc > > /* > > * idx now points to the pool we want to allocate from > > */ > > - bp = bvec_array + *idx; > > > > - bvl = mempool_alloc(bp->pool, gfp_mask); > > + bp = bvec_slabs + *idx; > > + bvl = mempool_alloc(bs->bvec_pools[*idx], gfp_mask); > > if (bvl) > > memset(bvl, 0, bp->nr_vecs * sizeof(struct bio_vec)); > > + > > return bvl; > > } > > > > /* > > - * default destructor for a bio allocated with bio_alloc() > > + * default destructor for a bio allocated with bio_alloc_bs() > > */ > > static void bio_destructor(struct bio *bio) > > { > > const int pool_idx = BIO_POOL_IDX(bio); > > - struct biovec_pool *bp = bvec_array + pool_idx; > > + struct bio_set *bs = bio->bi_set; > > > > BIO_BUG_ON(pool_idx >= BIOVEC_NR_POOLS); > > > > - mempool_free(bio->bi_io_vec, bp->pool); > > - mempool_free(bio, bio_pool); > > + mempool_free(bio->bi_io_vec, bs->bvec_pools[pool_idx]); > > + mempool_free(bio, bs->bio_pool); > > } > > > > inline void bio_init(struct bio *bio) > > @@ -121,18 +137,21 @@ inline void bio_init(struct bio *bio) > > } > > > > /** > > - * bio_alloc - allocate a bio for I/O > > + * bio_alloc_bs - allocate a bio for I/O > > * @gfp_mask: the GFP_ mask given to the slab allocator > > * @nr_iovecs: number of iovecs to pre-allocate > > bs is awefully close to 'block size' when it comes to acronyms in this > area, I would prefer if you just called it bio_alloc_bioset() instead. > > > +void bioset_free(struct bio_set *bs) > > +{ > > + if (!bs->bio_pool) > > + mempool_destroy(bs->bio_pool); > > That check looks suspect, surely you mean to check for non-NULL. > > > + > > + biovec_free_pools(bs); > > + > > + kfree(bs); > > +} > > + > > +struct bio_set *bioset_create(int bio_pool_size, int bvec_pool_size, int scale) > > +{ > > + struct bio_set *bs = kmalloc(sizeof(*bs), GFP_KERNEL); > > + > > + if (!bs) > > + return NULL; > > + > > + memset(bs, 0, sizeof(*bs)); > > + bs->bio_pool = mempool_create(bio_pool_size, mempool_alloc_slab, > > + mempool_free_slab, bio_slab); > > + > > + if (!bs->bio_pool) > > + goto bad; > > + > > + if (biovec_create_pools(bs, bvec_pool_size, scale)) > > + goto bad; > > + > > + return bs; > > + > > +bad: > > + bioset_free(bs); > > + return NULL; > > +} > > Please drop the last goto > > if (!biovec_create_pools(bs, bvec_pool_size, scale)) > return bs; > > is nicer. > > -- > Jens Axboe > > -- > dm-devel mailing list > dm-devel@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/