Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S266150AbRGDT3Z>; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 15:29:25 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S266149AbRGDT3P>; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 15:29:15 -0400
Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:13330 "EHLO
	the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S266150AbRGDT3D>; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 15:29:03 -0400
Subject: Re: >128 MB RAM stability problems (again)
To: rbultje@ronald.bitfreak.net (Ronald Bultje)
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 20:29:06 +0100 (BST)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Linux Kernel Mailing List)
In-Reply-To: <994279551.1116.0.camel@tux> from "Ronald Bultje" at Jul 04, 2001 10:45:24 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E15HsKg-0001Pk-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> I'm kind of astounded now, WHY can't linux-2.4.x run on ANY machine in
> my house with more than 128 MB RAM?!? Can someone please point out to me

Can I suggest you change your memory vendor and/or get an antistatic wrist 
strap ?

> that he's actually running kernel-2.4.x on a machine with more than 128
> MB RAM and that he's NOT having severe stability problems?

Multiple boxes, all solid with 256Mb


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/