Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263001AbVBCVo3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:44:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262186AbVBCVo1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:44:27 -0500 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:28883 "EHLO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263001AbVBCVmr (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:42:47 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:41:33 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Bill Huey Cc: "Jack O'Quin" , Nick Piggin , Paul Davis , Con Kolivas , linux , rlrevell@joe-job.com, CK Kernel , utz , Andrew Morton , alexn@dsv.su.se, Rui Nuno Capela , Chris Wright , Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [patch, 2.6.11-rc2] sched: RLIMIT_RT_CPU_RATIO feature Message-ID: <20050203214133.GA27956@elte.hu> References: <874qh3bo1u.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <1106796360.5158.39.camel@npiggin-nld.site> <87pszr1mi1.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <20050127113530.GA30422@elte.hu> <873bwfo8br.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <20050202111045.GA12155@nietzsche.lynx.com> <87is5ahpy1.fsf@sulphur.joq.us> <20050202211405.GA13941@nietzsche.lynx.com> <20050202212100.GA12808@elte.hu> <20050202213402.GB14023@nietzsche.lynx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050202213402.GB14023@nietzsche.lynx.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1139 Lines: 25 * Bill Huey wrote: > > but Jack is right in practical terms: the audio folks achieved pretty > > good results with the current IRQ threading mechanism, partly due to the > > fact that the audio stack doesnt use softirqs, so all the > > latency-critical activities are in the audio IRQ thread and the > > application itself. > > It's clever that they do that, but additional control is needed in the > future. jackd isn't the most sophisticate media app on this planet (not > too much of an insult :)) [...] i think you are underestimating Jack - it is easily amongst the most sophisticated audio frameworks in existence, and it certainly has one of the most robust designs. Just shop around on google for Jack-based audio applications. What i'd love to see is more integration (and cooperation) between the audio frameworks of desktop projects (KDE, Gnome) and Jack. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/