Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 21:19:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 21:19:38 -0400 Received: from h24-78-188-202.vn.shawcable.net ([24.78.188.202]:12559 "EHLO cs206465-b.nvcr1.bc.wave.home.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 21:19:26 -0400 Message-ID: <3B43C13C.16BA4709@linisoft.com> Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 18:22:05 -0700 From: Reza Roboubi Organization: Linisoft X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-3 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Bornemann CC: Ronald Bultje , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: >128 MB RAM stability problems (again) In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nobody has answered a basic concern: Why does Win2k work while Linux does not? We already know that MiciSoft sometimes helps make stupid standards like P&P ISA cards and then writes drivers for them. Something that is hard to do for any _sane_ developers who did not help make the stupid "standard". Having said that, if anybody has a technical answer for Ronald please give it to him. He says: My systems ARE FINE BECAUSE Win2k runs on them. This deserves a direct technical answer if anybody has one. -------------------- I'm a Linux user and proud of it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/