From: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki-news2005-01@lina.inka.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Huge unreliability - does Linux have something to do with it?
Organization: Private Site running Debian GNU/Linux
In-Reply-To: <5a2cf1f605020401037aa610b9@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: tin/1.7.6-20040906 ("Baleshare") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.8.1 (i686))
Message-Id: <E1Cx0xm-0000GD-00@calista.eckenfels.6bone.ka-ip.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:45:22 +0100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1119
Lines: 25

In article <5a2cf1f605020401037aa610b9@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
> I halted the machine correctly yesterday night. I never dropped the
> box in 3 years. Am I just being unlucky? Or could the fact that I am
> using Linux on the box affect the reliability in some ways on that
> particular hardware (Dell Inspiron 8100)? I run Linux on 3 other
> computers and never had single problems with them.

There are a lot of possible problems with your actual hardware. Like
Interrupt handling, power control, dma, ... Those are seldom but possible.
Notebooks tend to require some special handling.

> Could a hardware failure look like bad sectors to fsck?

A failure of the bus or a former sporadic error can cause defective fs, but
normally you have a read error in fsck no structure error.

Are you using hdparm? is the system perhaps overheating or overclocked?

Greetings
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/