Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 21:44:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 21:44:01 -0400 Received: from hal.qcc.sk.ca ([198.169.27.4]:48908 "HELO hal.qcc.sk.ca") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 21:43:46 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 19:43:44 -0600 From: Charles Cazabon To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: >128 MB RAM stability problems (again) Message-ID: <20010704194344.B1453@hal.qcc.sk.ca> In-Reply-To: <3B43C13C.16BA4709@linisoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B43C13C.16BA4709@linisoft.com>; from reza@linisoft.com on Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 06:22:05PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reza Roboubi wrote: > Nobody has answered a basic concern: > Why does Win2k work while Linux does not? I did post a possible answer for this: different OSes excercise the memory subsystem very differently. This is why a box might run (say) Win95 apparently stably, but not be able to run Linux. The same reasoning applies to other OSes. I've seen this many times myself. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/