Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 21:54:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 21:54:12 -0400 Received: from beasley.gator.com ([63.197.87.202]:49420 "EHLO beasley.gator.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 21:54:01 -0400 From: "George Bonser" To: "Reza Roboubi" , "Peter Bornemann" Cc: "Ronald Bultje" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" Subject: RE: >128 MB RAM stability problems (again) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 18:58:03 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3B43C13C.16BA4709@linisoft.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Nobody has answered a basic concern: > Why does Win2k work while Linux does not? The answer could be as simple as the fact that Linux might be trying to write to the exact memory location that is bad but Win2k has not. It might also be that he in fact DOES have problems with win2k but is unaware of it, that location might be used for data storage rather than program execution. All I can say is this ... I have never used Windows on our production web farms and Linux 2.4 appears to work just fine will many different sizes of memory ... all greater than 128MB. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/