Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S266618AbRGEDOM>; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 23:14:12 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S266181AbRGEDOB>; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 23:14:01 -0400
Received: from smarty.smart.net ([207.176.80.102]:41740 "EHLO smarty.smart.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S266621AbRGEDNt>;
	Wed, 4 Jul 2001 23:13:49 -0400
From: Rick Hohensee <humbubba@smarty.smart.net>
Message-Id: <200107050326.XAA29768@smarty.smart.net>
Subject: Re: Why Plan 9 C compilers don't have asm("")
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 23:26:40 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

>Now, you could probably argue that instead of inline asms we should have
>more flexibility in doing a per-callee calling convention. That would be
>good too, no question about it.
>
>                        Linus
>

Today's flamebait has been postponed. Happy July 4th. Peace.

Rick Hohensee
		www.clienux.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/