Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269320AbVBEOWb (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Feb 2005 09:22:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269341AbVBEOWb (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Feb 2005 09:22:31 -0500 Received: from ms004msg.fastwebnet.it ([213.140.2.58]:64686 "EHLO ms004msg.fastwebnet.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269320AbVBEOWY (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Feb 2005 09:22:24 -0500 Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 15:22:34 +0100 From: Paolo Ornati To: Axel Schmalowsky Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: L1_CACHE Message-ID: <20050205152234.2670fdee@tux.homenet> In-Reply-To: <4204B1D2.9070609@mglug.de> References: <4204B1D2.9070609@mglug.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 641 Lines: 22 On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 11:45:22 +0000 Axel Schmalowsky wrote: > Can anyone tell me if it is destruktive or does it cause lose of > performance if I set up > L1_CACHE_SHIFT_MAX as well as CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT to the value > of 10? > > I've an Intel centrino processor with 1MB L1-Cache. 1 MB L1? Isn't it L2? -- Paolo Ornati Gentoo Linux (kernel 2.6.10-gentoo-r6) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/