Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267934AbVBEXZV (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Feb 2005 18:25:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268373AbVBEXZU (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Feb 2005 18:25:20 -0500 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:52874 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268354AbVBEXZM (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Feb 2005 18:25:12 -0500 To: Hans-Peter Jansen Cc: Shane Hathaway , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] Configure MTU via kernel DHCP References: <200502022148.00045.shane@hathawaymix.org> <200502041755.41288.hpj@urpla.net> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: 05 Feb 2005 16:23:14 -0700 In-Reply-To: <200502041755.41288.hpj@urpla.net> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 999 Lines: 25 Hans-Peter Jansen writes: > Hi Shane, > > Difference: 181 Bytes (padding ignored) > > The whole module takes about 9K, compared to dhcp in initrd, which > takes a few hundred K! Hmm. And the kinit from the klibc package (A static executable that does everything the kernel currently does for mounting root including handling what ipconfig handles it in only 35K (uncompressed). > That's an interesting question. Please keep me informed on any new > perceptions in this respect. > > May the linux gods indulge on this topic one day or remove the > ipconfig module completely. Well that actually is the goal. A major problem is that there are enough policy issues that the kernel simply cannot get it right, for all users. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/