Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263330AbVBFELL (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Feb 2005 23:11:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263112AbVBFELL (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Feb 2005 23:11:11 -0500 Received: from adsl-63-197-226-105.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([63.197.226.105]:16051 "EHLO cheetah.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263330AbVBFEKu convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Feb 2005 23:10:50 -0500 Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 20:02:42 -0800 From: "David S. Miller" To: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, mirko.parthey@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, shemminger@osdl.org Subject: Re: PROBLEM: 2.6.11-rc2 hangs on bridge shutdown (br0) Message-Id: <20050205200242.2b629de7.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20050205.195039.05988480.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> References: <20050205061110.GA18275@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050204221344.247548cb.davem@davemloft.net> <20050205064643.GA29758@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050205.195039.05988480.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: "_;p5u5aPsO,_Vsx"^v-pEq09'CU4&Dc1$fQExov$62l60cgCc%FnIwD=.UF^a>?5'9Kn[;433QFVV9M..2eN.@4ZWPGbdi<=?[:T>y?SD(R*-3It"Vj:)"dP Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1095 Lines: 22 On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 19:50:39 +0900 (JST) YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote: > In article <20050205064643.GA29758@gondor.apana.org.au> (at Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:46:43 +1100), Herbert Xu says: > > > If we wanted to preserve the split device semantics, then we > > can create a local GC list in IPv6 so that it can search based > > on rt6i_idev as well as the other keys. Alternatively we can > > remove the dst->dev == dev check in dst_dev_event and dst_ifdown > > and move that test down to the individual ifdown functions. > > Yes, IPv6 needs "split device" semantics > (for per-device statistics such as Ip6InDelivers etc), > and I like later solution. Ok. I never read whether ipv6, like ipv4, is specified to support a model of host based ownership of addresses. Does anyone know? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/