Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261177AbVBFOgI (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Feb 2005 09:36:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261176AbVBFOgH (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Feb 2005 09:36:07 -0500 Received: from smtp-100-sunday.nerim.net ([62.4.16.100]:26897 "EHLO kraid.nerim.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261177AbVBFOgC (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Feb 2005 09:36:02 -0500 Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:36:00 +0100 From: Jean Delvare To: Alexey Dobriyan , "Mark A. Greer" Cc: Greg KH , LM Sensors , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH][I2C] Marvell mv64xxx i2c driver Message-Id: <20050206153600.2d8fb127.khali@linux-fr.org> In-Reply-To: <3s6eEus2.1107510325.6106480.khali@localhost> References: <4202BBF9.3020104@mvista.com> <3s6eEus2.1107510325.6106480.khali@localhost> Reply-To: LM Sensors , LKML X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1329 Lines: 31 Hi all, Quoting myself: > I am as surprised as you are to see this here. I2C_ALGO_AU1550 should > really be made a different value. There is also a problem with > I2C_ALGO_PCA and I2C_ALGO_SIBYTE having the same value, which was > already reported to Greg some days ago if memory serves. I think I > will send a patch against 2.6.10-rc3 to Linus this evening, which > fixes the broken algo IDs. That way Mark can keep the algorithm ID he > is using right now, and each algorithm will get its own, unique ID, as > should be. I've changed my mind since. There isn't anything critical here and pushing random patches to Linus right before he releases 2.6.11 wouldn't have been particularly subtle. So I instead sent a patch to Greg, as can be seen here: http://archives.andrew.net.au/lm-sensors/msg29405.html So Mark, providing Greg accepts this patch, you can assume that I2C_ALGO_MV64XXX is already properly defined in Greg's tree (where your own patch will end up) so you don't need to add it yourself. You will still have to define I2C_HW_MV64XXX though. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/