Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261165AbVBFP2g (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Feb 2005 10:28:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261173AbVBFP2f (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Feb 2005 10:28:35 -0500 Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([205.233.218.70]:57096 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261165AbVBFP2d (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Feb 2005 10:28:33 -0500 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] "iswraid" (ICHxR ataraid sub-driver) for 2.4.29 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Martins Krikis , marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk In-Reply-To: <420631BF.7060407@pobox.com> References: <87651hdoiv.fsf@yahoo.com> <420582C6.7060407@pobox.com> <1107682076.22680.58.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <58cb370e050206044513eb7f89@mail.gmail.com> <42062BFE.7070907@pobox.com> <1107701373.22680.115.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <420631BF.7060407@pobox.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 16:28:20 +0100 Message-Id: <1107703700.22680.124.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 2.63 on canuck.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (0.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by canuck.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1599 Lines: 38 On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 10:03 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Arjan van de Ven wrote: > >>I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since otherwise > >>user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups. > > > > > > the same is true for all new hardware drivers and hardware support > > patches. And for new DRM (since new X may need it) and new .. and > > new ... where is the line? > > > > for me a deep maintenance mode is about keeping existing stuff working; > > all new hw support and derivative hardware support (such as this) can be > > pointed at the new stable series... which has been out for quite some > > time now.. > > Red herring. > > 2.4.x has ICH5/6 support -- but is missing the RAID support component. > > We are talking about hardware that is ALREADY supported by 2.4.x kernel, > not new hardware. I'm talking about derivative hardware support. While this is not technically a hardware device driver, it sure is similar to one. > We are also talking about inability to access data on hardware supported > by 2.4.x, not something that can easily be ignored or papered over with > a compatibility mode. It's a new feature. It's support for a hw related feature not previously supported. Now you can argue if such a new feature is appropriate or not, but I don't see any way of arguing that this is not a new feature. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/