Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261152AbVBGPI3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:08:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261160AbVBGPI3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:08:29 -0500 Received: from lirs02.phys.au.dk ([130.225.28.43]:52921 "EHLO lirs02.phys.au.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261152AbVBGPI2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:08:28 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 16:08:23 +0100 (MET) From: Esben Nielsen To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Real-Time Preemption and UML? In-Reply-To: <20050207092128.GA19189@elte.hu> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-DAIMI-Spam-Score: -2.82 () ALL_TRUSTED Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 859 Lines: 20 Hi, I am trying to compile and run UM-Linux with PREEMPT_REALTIME. I managed to get it to compile but it wont start - it simply stops somewhere in start_kernel() :-( Have anyone else looked at it? It doesn't sound like it makes much sense to have PREEMPT_REALTIME for UML but I thought it was a good developing platform for playing around before going to the real hardware, where the latency meassurements of course have to take place. The turn around time should be much shorter than rebooting a full PC every time and the possibility of getting debug output in the beginning should also be much better. Esben - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/