Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261187AbVBGQtw (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:49:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261188AbVBGQtw (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:49:52 -0500 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:32747 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261187AbVBGQtu (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:49:50 -0500 Message-ID: <420797DE.6030904@osdl.org> Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 08:31:26 -0800 From: "Randy.Dunlap" Organization: OSDL User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Charles-Edouard Ruault CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: IO port conflict between timer & watchdog on PCISA-C800EV board ? References: <420734DC.4020900@idtect.com> In-Reply-To: <420734DC.4020900@idtect.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1769 Lines: 40 Charles-Edouard Ruault wrote: > Hi All, > > i wrote a driver for the watchdog timer provided by a small form factor > board from IEI ( the PCISA-C800EV : > http://www.iei.com.tw/en/product_IPC.asp?model=PCISA-C800 ). > This board has a Via Apollo PLE133 ( VT8601A and VT82C686B ) chipset. > The watchdog uses two registers at addresses 0x43 and 0x443, therefore > my driver tries to get bot addresses for its own use calling > request_region(0x43, 1, "watchdog" ) and request_region(0x443, 1, > "watchdog"). > The first call to request 0x43 fails because the address has already > been allocated to the timer ( /proc/ioports shows 0040-005f : timer ). > > So my questions are : > - Why is the generic timer using this address ? isn't it reserving a too > wide portion of IO ports ? Should it be modified for this board ? > - If there's a good reason for the timer to request this address, is > there a clean way to share it with the timer ? Missing kernel version.... must be "not the current/latest", so early 2.6 or more likely 2.4 (just guessing)? /proc/ioports timer assignments have now been split up like this: 0040-0043 : timer0 0050-0053 : timer1 However, port 0x43 is still assigned to timer0, so your request_region call will still fail. What system board timer resource assignments should be used for that VIA chipset? If the chipset timer only needs 0x40-0x42, e.g., leaving 0x43 available, then it would be possible to do some kind of workaround (maybe not real clean, but possible). -- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/