Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261209AbVBGRzy (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:55:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261211AbVBGRzx (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:55:53 -0500 Received: from mailhub2.nextra.sk ([195.168.1.110]:55567 "EHLO toe.nextra.sk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261209AbVBGRzr (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:55:47 -0500 Message-ID: <4207AC02.8010407@rainbow-software.org> Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:57:22 +0100 From: Ondrej Zary User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Randy.Dunlap" CC: Charles-Edouard Ruault , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: IO port conflict between timer & watchdog on PCISA-C800EV board ? References: <420734DC.4020900@idtect.com> <420797DE.6030904@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <420797DE.6030904@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 868 Lines: 22 Randy.Dunlap wrote: [...] > /proc/ioports timer assignments have now been split up like this: > 0040-0043 : timer0 > 0050-0053 : timer1 > > However, port 0x43 is still assigned to timer0, so your request_region > call will still fail. What system board timer resource assignments > should be used for that VIA chipset? If the chipset timer only needs > 0x40-0x42, e.g., leaving 0x43 available, then it would be possible > to do some kind of workaround (maybe not real clean, but possible). The timer uses ports 0x40-0x43. However, port 0x43 is defined as WO (write-only) - it's timer command register. -- Ondrej Zary - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/