Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261497AbVBHJou (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2005 04:44:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261500AbVBHJou (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2005 04:44:50 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:42984 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261497AbVBHJoo (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2005 04:44:44 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 01:44:33 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Jens Axboe Cc: solt2@dns.toxicfilms.tv, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 bad scheduling while atomic + lockup Message-Id: <20050208014433.42320fc4.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20050208093713.GC15985@suse.de> References: <1865944987.20050207081532@dns.toxicfilms.tv> <20050208010024.7071e5f7.akpm@osdl.org> <20050208093713.GC15985@suse.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 824 Lines: 20 Jens Axboe wrote: > > > ->axboe! > > :-) > > The thing wants a rewrite. Ideally the serializing point would be a > special request. The patch is still better than nothing right now, it's > really easy to hang the device with hdparm in -linus since it's > impossible to guess when it is safe to issue tuning actions from user > space. I'm not sure which is worse, really. I've never hung an interface with hdparm, nor seen any reports of it. Making I/O errors deadly rather hurts. Will it happen on all I/O errors, or was this a special case? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/