Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261510AbVBHKlJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2005 05:41:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261511AbVBHKlI (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2005 05:41:08 -0500 Received: from ppsw-8.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.138]:25799 "EHLO ppsw-8.csi.cam.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261510AbVBHKlF (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2005 05:41:05 -0500 Subject: Re: [BUG report] UML linux-2.6 latest BK doesn't compile From: Anton Altaparmakov To: Blaisorblade Cc: Jeff Dike , lkml , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <200502081122.22613.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> References: <1107857395.15872.2.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> <200502081122.22613.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: University of Cambridge Computing Service, UK Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 10:40:54 +0000 Message-Id: <1107859254.582.4.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2195 Lines: 55 On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 11:22 +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Tuesday 08 February 2005 11:09, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > With the current linux-2.6 BK tree I get this when trying to compile > > UML: > > > > CC init/version.o > > LD init/built-in.o > > LD .tmp_vmlinux1 > > arch/um/kernel/built-in.o(__ksymtab+0x2b0): In function `um_execve': > > arch/um/kernel/exec_kern.c:59: undefined reference to `__bb_init_func' > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > KSYM .tmp_kallsyms1.S > > nm: '.tmp_vmlinux1': No such file > > /bin/bash: line 1: 26161 Exit 1 nm -n .tmp_vmlinux1 > > 26162 Segmentation fault | scripts/kallsyms >.tmp_kallsyms1.S > > make: *** [.tmp_kallsyms1.S] Error 139 > > > > This is with SKAS mode enabled and TT disabled. My .config is attached. > > Hmm - I do not understand at all where `__bb_init_func' comes from (not from > UML by sure, only from kernel headers possibly). And from preprocessing the > source (of the -bk4 snapshot), nothing similar comes out. It is from UML. 'bk -r grep __bb_init_func' gives: arch/um/kernel/gmon_syms.c 1.1 extern void __bb_init_func(void *); arch/um/kernel/gmon_syms.c 1.1 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bb_init_func); The kernel compiles fine with the same .config but TT mode also enabled. So I suspect that in the non-TT case the gmon_syms binary doesn't get linked into the kernel so the symbol is missing or something like that... Also note I am using the latest BK as pulled about an hour ago. I don't know how old the snapshot you are using is in comparison. Lots of UML changes were pulled in by my pull... Best regards, Anton -- Anton Altaparmakov (replace at with @) Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/