Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 18:17:30 +0100 (CET)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
To: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
cc: Stelian Pop <stelian@popies.net>, Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Linux Kernel Subversion Howto
In-Reply-To: <20050208155845.GB14505@bitmover.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0502081812090.6118@scrub.home>
References: <20050204160631.GB26748@bitmover.com> <20050204170306.GB3467@crusoe.alcove-fr>
 <20050204183922.GC27707@bitmover.com> <20050204200507.GE5028@deep-space-9.dsnet>
 <20050204201157.GN27707@bitmover.com> <20050204214015.GF5028@deep-space-9.dsnet>
 <20050204233153.GA28731@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20050205193848.GH5028@deep-space-9.dsnet>
 <20050205233841.GA20875@bitmover.com> <20050208154343.GH3537@crusoe.alcove-fr>
 <20050208155845.GB14505@bitmover.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 765
Lines: 20

Hi,

On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Larry McVoy wrote:

> I think you are dreaming.  You've gone from wanting enough information
> to supposedly debug your source tree to being explicit about wanting to
> recreate the entire BK history in a different system.  The former is a
> reasonable request, I suppose, but the latter is just a blatent request
> for us to help debug and stress test a competing system.  
> 
> The answer is no, that's a clear violation of the license.

You do realize what this practically means?

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/