Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261716AbVBIA2i (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:28:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261718AbVBIA2c (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:28:32 -0500 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:48272 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261716AbVBIA14 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:27:56 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 16:27:05 -0800 From: Paul Jackson To: nagar@watson.ibm.com Cc: colpatch@us.ibm.com, dino@in.ibm.com, mbligh@aracnet.com, pwil3058@bigpond.net.au, frankeh@watson.ibm.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@osdl.org, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, efocht@hpce.nec.com, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, hch@infradead.org, steiner@sgi.com, jbarnes@sgi.com, sylvain.jeaugey@bull.net, djh@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Simon.Derr@bull.net, ak@suse.de, sivanich@sgi.com Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement Message-Id: <20050208162705.351b4543.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <42095222.5010700@watson.ibm.com> References: <20041001164118.45b75e17.akpm@osdl.org> <20041001230644.39b551af.pj@sgi.com> <20041002145521.GA8868@in.ibm.com> <415ED3E3.6050008@watson.ibm.com> <415F37F9.6060002@bigpond.net.au> <821020000.1096814205@[10.10.2.4]> <20041003083936.7c844ec3.pj@sgi.com> <834330000.1096847619@[10.10.2.4]> <1097014749.4065.48.camel@arrakis> <420800F5.9070504@us.ibm.com> <20050208095440.GA3976@in.ibm.com> <42090C42.7020700@us.ibm.com> <20050208124234.6aed9e28.pj@sgi.com> <420939B6.7010608@us.ibm.com> <42095222.5010700@watson.ibm.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 709 Lines: 20 Shailabh wrote: > Well, I'm not sure I want to minutely examine Paul's choice of words ! You're a wise man ;). > Rereading the earlier posts on the thread, I'd agree. There are some > similarities in our interfaces but not enough to warrant a merger. As I said ... a wise man ! -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/