Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261748AbVBICYj (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2005 21:24:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261750AbVBICYj (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2005 21:24:39 -0500 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.194]:29047 "EHLO rproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261748AbVBICYf (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2005 21:24:35 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=G0aA0s2m5vKMKNolZyHUMVvT4FSR625LMJqYwQAJKdMqSWvb3Z5G3bblA52i4fthseb5IVQuZoV+YiZKfqS/bThbT/HR/WgMBwf0mojDSzKTXgR259mx5ivroZgH/KvtUv89YJJBd0YurwTN+YQX+QHjYHsmTZrmR2s2tp5fSPY= Message-ID: <9e47339105020818242fd9f6fa@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 21:24:04 -0500 From: Jon Smirl Reply-To: Jon Smirl To: Roman Zippel Subject: Re: [RFC] Linux Kernel Subversion Howto Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" , Larry McVoy , Stelian Pop , Francois Romieu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050204201157.GN27707@bitmover.com> <20050205193848.GH5028@deep-space-9.dsnet> <20050205233841.GA20875@bitmover.com> <20050208154343.GH3537@crusoe.alcove-fr> <20050208155845.GB14505@bitmover.com> <20050208181634.GA20261@bitmover.com> <20050209000733.GA6308@thunk.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1282 Lines: 26 On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 03:05:18 +0100 (CET), Roman Zippel wrote: > The current problem is more serious and I want that bk users to understand > that. A large part of kernel history is currently practically locked into > bk. bk isn't doing what I need, so naturally I'm looking for alternatives, > but I don't have the freedom to take my data and try it with some other > tool. Was that really part of the deal when bk was introduced that I'm > denied of this freedom? Larry has said he will do the work you want if you pay him. This is not lack of freedom it is lack of cash. So if you really believe in this cough up the dough for Larry, and then only if he refuses to do the work after being paid do you have valid reasons to complain. This is not an argument about freedom, it's trying to get someone else to do work for you for free. Start a PayPal account and get all of the unhappy people to contribute. I'll chip in $10 just so that I don't have to read these rants anymore. -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/