Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262012AbVBJCOI (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:14:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262013AbVBJCOI (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:14:08 -0500 Received: from unused.mind.net ([69.9.134.98]:28620 "EHLO echo.lysdexia.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262012AbVBJCN5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:13:57 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:13:47 -0800 (PST) From: William Weston To: Ingo Molnar cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01 In-Reply-To: <20050209115121.GA13608@elte.hu> Message-ID: References: <20050204100347.GA13186@elte.hu> <20050209115121.GA13608@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 5433 Lines: 141 On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Running wmcube (an impractical, greedy, little CPU meter), even when > > niced, causes lots of xruns. It may be good for worst-case-scenario > > desktop load testing. > > this phenomenon is very weird. > > Firstly, make sure that all relevant threads (including the soundcard > IRQ thread, jackd threads, jack client thread, etc.) have higher RT > priority than any other, latency-irrelevant threads in the system. Thanks for the tip. I have schedtool installed, and all audio/MIDI IRQ threads, jack threads, and jack clients are now run with higher priorities than everything else. Before I adjusted priorities, I was getting a bunch of these when running latencytest (which have since disappeared): rtc: lost some interrupts at 8192Hz. bug in rtc_read(): called in state S_IDLE! IRQ 8 (RTC) is still giving me some issues, even after adjusting priorities: `IRQ 8'[232] is being piggy. need_resched=0, cpu=0 Read missed before next interrupt Should the RTC IRQ be given a new priority? If so, should it be lower, higher, or equal to the audio/MIDI/jack priorities? > If everything looks OK on the priority-administration side, could you > enable wakeup-latency tracing via: > > CONFIG_WAKEUP_TIMING=y > CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACE=y > # CONFIG_CRITICAL_PREEMPT_TIMING is not set > # CONFIG_CRITICAL_IRQSOFF_TIMING is not set > CONFIG_LATENCY_TIMING=y > CONFIG_LATENCY_TRACE=y > what is the longest wakeup latency the tracer shows? You can start the > measurement anew via: > > echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/preempt_max_latency Max latency is in the realm of 13-18 after runs of jack_test4.1. > every new maximum-latency event will be logged by the kernel, and the > trace of the latest worst-case latency path can be found under > /proc/latency_trace. > > (If the trace is very long then most of the time it's OK to just send > the first 25 and last 10 lines. Putting the trace up to a website is a > good solution too.) See http://www.sysex.net/testing/ for the all of the test results and system info on a 2.6.11-rc3-RT-V0.7.38-06 kernel. This is from my most recent run of jack_test4.1 with wmcube and kernel compilation running (check /testing/dmesg for more): ( sshd-5940 |#0): new 4 s maximum-latency wakeup. ( IRQ 16-1803 |#0): new 5 s maximum-latency wakeup. ( make-28375|#0): new 6 s maximum-latency wakeup. ( ksoftirqd/0-2 |#0): new 6 s maximum-latency wakeup. ( ksoftirqd/0-2 |#0): new 7 s maximum-latency wakeup. ( ksoftirqd/0-2 |#0): new 8 s maximum-latency wakeup. ( ksoftirqd/0-2 |#0): new 8 s maximum-latency wakeup. ( ksoftirqd/0-2 |#0): new 9 s maximum-latency wakeup. ( ksoftirqd/0-2 |#0): new 10 s maximum-latency wakeup. ( ksoftirqd/0-2 |#0): new 10 s maximum-latency wakeup. ( jackd-29348|#0): new 12 s maximum-latency wakeup. ( jackd-29348|#0): new 14 s maximum-latency wakeup. ( jackd-29348|#0): new 15 s maximum-latency wakeup. > it should not matter how 'greedy' wmcube is. Does it do alot of graphics > activity (perhaps 3D too?) - that could in theory cause hardware > latencies - the latency traces will tell. Wmcube displays a 3D spinning cube, which spins faster (actually performs larger rotations between updates) when CPU usage goes up. When running niced, wmcube uses about 1% to 4% of the CPU, adds about 1000 context switches per second, and increases X load by 1% to 3% of the total CPU. Now that the priorities are tuned, I get no xruns while running wmcube, compiling a kernel, and running latencytest or jack_test4.1. > > MIDI playback through any MPU-401 interface triggers the following > > BUG, reported once for each outgoing MIDI event (non MPU-401 hw > > interfaces and sw interfaces not affected): > > the patch below should fix this. (also included in -38-06 and later > kernels.) > > Ingo > > --- linux/sound/drivers/mpu401/mpu401_uart.c.orig > +++ linux/sound/drivers/mpu401/mpu401_uart.c > @@ -316,12 +316,12 @@ static void snd_mpu401_uart_input_trigge > /* read data in advance */ > /* prevent double enter via rawmidi->event callback */ > if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mpu->rx_loop)) { > - local_irq_save(flags); > + local_irq_save_nort(flags); > if (spin_trylock(&mpu->input_lock)) { > snd_mpu401_uart_input_read(mpu); > spin_unlock(&mpu->input_lock); > } > - local_irq_restore(flags); > + local_irq_restore_nort(flags); > } > atomic_inc(&mpu->rx_loop); > } else { > @@ -407,12 +407,12 @@ static void snd_mpu401_uart_output_trigg > /* output pending data */ > /* prevent double enter via rawmidi->event callback */ > if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mpu->tx_loop)) { > - local_irq_save(flags); > + local_irq_save_nort(flags); > if (spin_trylock(&mpu->output_lock)) { > snd_mpu401_uart_output_write(mpu); > spin_unlock(&mpu->output_lock); > } > - local_irq_restore(flags); > + local_irq_restore_nort(flags); > } > atomic_inc(&mpu->tx_loop); > } else { This patch does fix the MIDI playback BUG I was seeing. Best Regards, --William Weston - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/