Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262373AbVBKWfP (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:35:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262374AbVBKWfO (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:35:14 -0500 Received: from mail.linicks.net ([217.204.244.146]:56460 "EHLO linux233.linicks.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262373AbVBKWfG (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:35:06 -0500 From: Nick Warne To: Terence Ripperda , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: How to disable slow agpgart in kernel config? Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 22:34:59 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200502111804.06899.nick@linicks.net> <20050211184821.GC15721@redhat.com> <20050211221956.GO24747@hygelac> In-Reply-To: <20050211221956.GO24747@hygelac> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502112234.59690.nick@linicks.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2110 Lines: 44 On Friday 11 February 2005 22:19, Terence Ripperda wrote: > > > I just read through the nVidia readme file, and there is a > > > comprehensive section on what module to use for what chipset (and > > > card). It recommends using the nVagp for my setup, > > is that the "CONFIGURING AGP" appendix? I didn't think that we > recommended which agp driver to use. the intention was just to > document which chipsets are supported by nvagp and point out that > agpgart may/probably supports more chipsets. that section also > documents some hardware 'issues' that we work around. we work around > these issues regardless of which agp driver is being used. Thats the one. I read this in APPENDIX F: "The following AGP chipsets are supported by NVIDIA's AGP; for all other chipsets it is recommended that you use the AGPGART module." as saying 'if you have one of these chipsets use nVagp' else use agpgart. > for this via kt133 issue, I looked through the agpgart and nvagp > initializations and didn't see anything much different. both > initialize and flush gart mappings the same way. both seem to allocate > memory the same way (nvagp uses __get_free_pages, which eventually > calls alloc_pages) with the GFP_KERNEL flag. I'm not sure why there > would be much difference between the two. I have had no issue at all running agpgart on Slackware 10 with KDE 3.3.x. It was just when I read this thread I didn't realise there was another option of a different NV module. I just tried it after reading deeper in the readme.txt ref. the Quake2 OpenGL 'rippling wave' I get every 5 minutes or so. It fixed it, BTW. I now have a constant clear display 100% in Quake2 :) I haven't noticed any difference at all in 2d desktop stuff (except maybe it is slightly brighter). Nick -- "When you're chewing on life's gristle, Don't grumble, Give a whistle..." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/