Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 13:59:20 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01
Message-ID: <20050213125920.GA10256@elte.hu>
References: <20050211082841.GA3349@elte.hu> <000601c5101f$8ca3c1e0$c800a8c0@mvista.com> <20050211100405.GA7452@elte.hu> <1108158547.21183.60.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1108158547.21183.60.camel@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 784
Lines: 24


* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> Ingo,
> 
> Here's a trivial patch to help others from freaking out when they see
> on a show_trace that most of their processes are TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE. 

thanks, applied it to -39-00.

> -	static const char *stat_nam[] = { "R", "S", "D", "T", "t", "Z", "X" };
> +	static const char *stat_nam[] = { "R", "M", "S", "D", "T", "t", "Z", "X" };

> I figure that "M" would be a good fit for TASK_RUNNING_MUTEX.

yeah - it's "M" already in fs/proc/array.c, but i missed the sched.c
case.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/