DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
        b=m6m2+fJt9Z/mnRWKm0FjyTfjENXIcZn9Yn9uh09OAaNM/umDj0gfCYkAqZtvmrsOImMTvH6vLMo1mNElt4HooM48imgve9GyCMmtrrkCvM+QmX8lSV/SEttDMAFhHnIfYCumgjSPGW0K2GK4MtcAjTcVHdonGVYjDXT1Rngbwww=
Message-ID: <58cb370e05021404081e53f458@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:08:58 +0100
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: lm@bitmover.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed
In-Reply-To: <20050214020802.GA3047@bitmover.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <20050214020802.GA3047@bitmover.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1067
Lines: 23

On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:08:02 -0800, Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com> wrote:
> is to clarify the non-compete stuff.  We've had some people who have
> indicated that they believed that if they used BK they were agreeing
> that they would never work on another SCM system.  We can see how it
> is possible that people would interpret the license that way but that
> wasn't our intent.  What we would like to do is change the language to

I always interpreted it the other way, that if I start working on other
SCM I should stop using BK.

> say that if you use BK you are agreeing that you won't work on another
> SCM for 1 year after you stop using BK.  But after that you would be

I don't even plan working on some SCM system, but being
tainted for 1 year for just *using* BK is not worth the price IMHO.

Regards,
Bartlomiej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/