Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261425AbVBNM1h (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2005 07:27:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261424AbVBNM1g (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2005 07:27:36 -0500 Received: from mail.linicks.net ([217.204.244.146]:38797 "EHLO linux233.linicks.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261425AbVBNM13 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2005 07:27:29 -0500 From: Nick Warne To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: make menuconfig Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:27:28 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200502141134.19094.nick@linicks.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502141227.28214.nick@linicks.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 959 Lines: 33 On Monday 14 February 2005 12:12, you wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Nick Warne wrote: > > Are the optimize && ? lines normal? > > They are only debug prints, but I'm quite sure they are fixed in recent > versions. > > > This is from a current tree that has an uptime of > 50 days > > Could you specify "current tree"? Yes, sorry, my bad wording. This is kernel 2.6.4 from kernel.org. I meant _my_ 'current' tree that runs perfect on the 233 box. I can't seem to upgrade to later 2.6.x kernels as I get curious swapd oops after a few hours, but that is another story. So I can ignore the debug prints? Thanks, Nick -- "When you're chewing on life's gristle, Don't grumble, Give a whistle..." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/