From: Russell Miller <rmiller@duskglow.com>
To: Marcin Dalecki <martin@dalecki.de>
Subject: Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:23:03 -0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.7
Cc: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20050214020802.GA3047@bitmover.com> <20050214154015.GA8075@bitmover.com> <3586df11f3bb037ab4b0284109ff9c0a@dalecki.de>
In-Reply-To: <3586df11f3bb037ab4b0284109ff9c0a@dalecki.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200502140923.03155.rmiller@duskglow.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1194
Lines: 33

On Monday 14 February 2005 09:14, Marcin Dalecki wrote:

> Give me a break!
> Did may the idea perhaps occur to you that maybe the above wish list is:
>
> 1. Utterly immoral.
> 2. Something you are by no ways entitled to have.
>
> If you want to be compensated for BK then put a price tag on it.
> So what are you now trying to do is basically to use peoples wish to
> contribute to
> free software as a measure to prohibiting them from competing with your
> commercial endeavor... that simply plain isn't fair play.
>
It is certainly Larry's choice to license his software any way he chooses.

It is my choice whether or not to use it.

BK will never pollute my machine as long as simply using it will restrict me 
from any other development or programming activity.  I can understand it if 
the source code is made available.  If it's just a binary... this is going 
way too far.

--Russell

-- 

Russell Miller - rmiller@duskglow.com - Agoura, CA
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/