Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261449AbVBNUkn (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:40:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261453AbVBNUkm (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:40:42 -0500 Received: from fmr16.intel.com ([192.55.52.70]:8595 "EHLO fmsfmr006.fm.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261449AbVBNUkg (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:40:36 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] make ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR depend on ACPI From: Len Brown To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Rolf Eike Beer , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: <200502141130.51901@bilbo.math.uni-mannheim.de> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1108413614.2092.5.camel@d845pe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.3 Date: 14 Feb 2005 15:40:14 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 739 Lines: 19 Re: ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR depending on ACPI or ACPI_INTERPRETER -- either are fine. Note that I'm planning to delete the separate ACPI_INTERPRETER build option and just use CONFIG_ACPI in the future. We tested this in a config clean-up in -mm a while back, and I should probably revive it for early 2.6.12. The reason is that there really isn't a valid concept of ACPI without the interpreter -- it can't even be used for configuring interrupts without the interpreter on hand. thanks, -Len - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/