Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261490AbVBNVOQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:14:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261485AbVBNVOQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:14:16 -0500 Received: from codepoet.org ([166.70.99.138]:7901 "EHLO codepoet.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261490AbVBNVOG (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:14:06 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:13:56 -0700 From: Erik Andersen To: lm@bitmover.com, Russell Miller , Marcin Dalecki , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed Message-ID: <20050214211356.GA1309@codepoet.org> Reply-To: andersen@codepoet.org Mail-Followup-To: andersen@codepoet.org, lm@bitmover.com, Russell Miller , Marcin Dalecki , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <20050214020802.GA3047@bitmover.com> <20050214154015.GA8075@bitmover.com> <3586df11f3bb037ab4b0284109ff9c0a@dalecki.de> <200502140923.03155.rmiller@duskglow.com> <20050214174932.GB8846@bitmover.com> <20050214192920.GA18876@bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050214192920.GA18876@bitmover.com> X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1725 Lines: 37 On Mon Feb 14, 2005 at 11:29:20AM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 09:49:32AM -0800, lm wrote: > > If it were spread out over the thousands of sites like your > > usage is then it would be more, there's a lot more overhead. There are > > currently more than 2,200 top level domains using BK for free (where > > top level means my-company.com, not my-workstation.my-company.com). > > http://www.bitkeeper.com/domains.html > > is a listing of the domains which have used bk-3.2.3 in the last 4 > months. It's slightly less than the claimed 2,200 because we looked > only at the bk-3.2.3 usage. Noting that I am included in the list (codepoet.org) -- do keep in mind that not all cases of having 'used bk' are equal. I suspect my situation is similar to many others in that I have only used bk in order to obtain source code for projects for which code is otherwise not readily available. Thats all. Nothing else. Call that using bk if you want, but I only do so since there is no currently viable alternative method... Without an alternative method, I am forced to use bk. If there were a viable alternative method to obtain current source code for projects now in bk (such as a nightly project snapshots, a read only bk2cvs/bk2whatever gateway) I would gladly remove bk immediately and use that other method instead. -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/ --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/