Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:34:00 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com>
Cc: Bernard Blackham <bernard@blackham.com.au>, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Address lots of pending pm_message_t changes
Message-ID: <20050214213400.GF12235@elf.ucw.cz>
References: <1108359808.12611.37.camel@desktop.cunningham.myip.net.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1108359808.12611.37.camel@desktop.cunningham.myip.net.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1257
Lines: 29

Hi!

> This patch is a conglomeration of about 5 patches that complete (I
> think!) the work of switching over to pm_message_t. Most of this work
> was done by Bernard Blackham, some by me, some by Pavel I think (I was
> out of action for part of the development). I believe it needs to go in
> before 2.6.11 in order to avoid compilation warnings and errors. The
> code has been in use by Suspend2 users for around three weeks. Please
> apply.
> 
> Pavel and Bernard, can you review and give your signoff?

Changes that change no code (u32 -> pm_message_t) are okay with me;
anything changing code (.event) has to wait after 2.6.11.

Andrew, if you get one big patch doing only type-safety (u32 ->
pm_message_t, no code changes), would you still take it this late? I
promise it is not going to break anything... It would help merge after
2.6.11 quite a lot...
								Pavel

-- 
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/