Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261525AbVBOCqq (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:46:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261559AbVBOCqq (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:46:46 -0500 Received: from clock-tower.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:8408 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261525AbVBOCqi (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:46:38 -0500 Subject: Re: Please open sysfs symbols to proprietary modules From: Alan Cox To: Andrew Morton Cc: Pavel Roskin , Linux Kernel Mailing List , greg@kroah.com, mochel@digitalimplant.org In-Reply-To: <20050204012042.6aedcf39.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20050204012042.6aedcf39.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1108431669.23141.88.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:41:11 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 990 Lines: 26 > You shouldn't, although many people do. It's a derived work and hence the > GPL is applicable. The only exception we make is for code which was > written for other operating systems and was then ported to Linux. As one of the copyright holders I make no such exception. Its either a derived work in law or its not. In the former case obey the license or remove every line of code derived from anything I wrote. If it's not a derived work then fine. If you aren't sure ask your lawyer. [Sorry I'm sort of obliged to reply to this comment to prove I'm defending my copyrights and not accepting various positions Linus and others may claim exist. I believe others like the FSF whose code is used in the kernel have similar views] Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/