Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261650AbVBOIdf (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Feb 2005 03:33:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261652AbVBOIdf (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Feb 2005 03:33:35 -0500 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.207]:23008 "EHLO rproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261650AbVBOIdd (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Feb 2005 03:33:33 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Ta3yU+ZpXEplMz2rRuP5damSAb45rmf2r6q/ZcMLi7+dxVDNArsn9QfsJTfEfACbY+10AmkQoWiKrHQ+7e7ezbQkqoOGGNUpvSgnrF47ZLHuFXkFxrbm2FHQaSzZCU/f/j+CQaUd7AJA8M/v/JpIC8f7oFnEdHv7VfCQgsjCdm0= Message-ID: <4d8e3fd305021500333835935e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:33:31 +0100 From: Paolo Ciarrocchi Reply-To: Paolo Ciarrocchi To: Lee Revell Subject: Re: [OT] speeding boot process (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] hotplug-ng 001 release) Cc: Roland Dreier , Prakash Punnoor , Greg KH , Patrick McFarland , linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1108424720.32293.8.camel@krustophenia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050211004033.GA26624@suse.de> <420C054B.1070502@downeast.net> <20050211011609.GA27176@suse.de> <1108354011.25912.43.camel@krustophenia.net> <4d8e3fd305021400323fa01fff@mail.gmail.com> <42106685.40307@arcor.de> <1108422240.28902.11.camel@krustophenia.net> <524qge20e2.fsf@topspin.com> <1108424720.32293.8.camel@krustophenia.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1573 Lines: 35 On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:45:20 -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 15:21 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > > Lee> I don't see why so much effort goes into improving boot time > > Lee> on the kernel side when the most obvious user space problem > > Lee> is ignored. > > > > How much of a win is it to run init scripts in parallel? I seem to > > recall seeing tests that show that it doesn't make much difference and > > may even slow things down by causing more disk seeks as various things > > start up at the same time and cause reads of different files to get > > interleaved. > > > > This is why Windows XP reserves sapce at the beginning of the disk for > the files read during the boot process and caches copies of them there. > > But, I was referring more to things like GDM not being started until all > the other init scripts are done. Why not start it first, and let the > network initialize while the user is logging in? > > > On the other hand, hotplug is an area that real profiling of real > > systems booting has identified as something that can be improved, and > > Greg's hotplug-ng seems to be a step towards a measurable improvement. Did anyone measure the improvement ? -- Paolo msn: paolo407@hotmail.com hello: ciarrop - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/