Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261845AbVBOUVh (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:21:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261862AbVBOUVh (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:21:37 -0500 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:58505 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261845AbVBOUMp (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:12:45 -0500 To: Andreas Deresch Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: panic during IO-APIC detection References: From: Andi Kleen Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:12:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Deresch's message of "Wed, 16 Feb 2005 17:26:22 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 542 Lines: 15 Andreas Deresch writes: > > The question is, should io_apic_get_unique_id be more fault tolerant, or > where else should this be fixed? Patch makes sense in theory, but I suspect there is more state to fix up to get rid of the IO-APIC than just decreasing nr_ioapics. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/