Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262047AbVBPPn5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:43:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262048AbVBPPn5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:43:57 -0500 Received: from dspnet.fr.eu.org ([62.73.5.179]:13578 "EHLO dspnet.fr.eu.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262047AbVBPPnh (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:43:37 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:43:21 +0100 From: Olivier Galibert To: Clemens Schwaighofer Cc: kernel@crazytrain.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed Message-ID: <20050216154321.GB34621@dspnet.fr.eu.org> Mail-Followup-To: Olivier Galibert , Clemens Schwaighofer , kernel@crazytrain.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20050214020802.GA3047@bitmover.com> <58cb370e05021404081e53f458@mail.gmail.com> <20050214150820.GA21961@optonline.net> <20050214154015.GA8075@bitmover.com> <7579f7fb0502141017f5738d1@mail.gmail.com> <20050214185624.GA16029@bitmover.com> <1108469967.3862.21.camel@crazytrain> <42131637.2070801@tequila.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42131637.2070801@tequila.co.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1221 Lines: 33 On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 06:45:27PM +0900, Clemens Schwaighofer wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 02/15/2005 09:19 PM, kernel wrote: > > > Just catching up on this thread. I guess I'm ultimately surprised that > > the developers here don't create a system *they* like with *their* > > knowledge and skillsets. > > > > With all of the complaining about BK you'd think there'd be an equal > > alternative. > > there is no need for that. There is already one. Subversion is a more > than mature VCS. Apache group is switching to it, gcc people are > strongly thinking about it, and those two are _huge_ projects with tons > of developers, patches, trunks, etc. > > Perhaps its about time, that linux also switches. Think what you want of Larry, but SVN is nowhere near BK is term of capabilities (and neither is arch for he matter). It's only better compared to cvs, and then not by that much. SCM is hard and not sexy, I'm afraid. OG. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/