Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262158AbVBQAL4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:11:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262159AbVBQAL4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:11:56 -0500 Received: from nabe.tequila.jp ([211.14.136.221]:52140 "HELO nabe.tequila.jp") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262158AbVBQALy (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:11:54 -0500 Message-ID: <4213E141.5040407@tequila.co.jp> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:11:45 +0900 From: Clemens Schwaighofer Organization: TEQUILA\Japan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041220 Thunderbird/1.0 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olivier Galibert CC: kernel@crazytrain.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed References: <20050214020802.GA3047@bitmover.com> <58cb370e05021404081e53f458@mail.gmail.com> <20050214150820.GA21961@optonline.net> <20050214154015.GA8075@bitmover.com> <7579f7fb0502141017f5738d1@mail.gmail.com> <20050214185624.GA16029@bitmover.com> <1108469967.3862.21.camel@crazytrain> <42131637.2070801@tequila.co.jp> <20050216154321.GB34621@dspnet.fr.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20050216154321.GB34621@dspnet.fr.eu.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1928 Lines: 49 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/17/2005 12:43 AM, Olivier Galibert wrote: >>Perhaps its about time, that linux also switches. > > > Think what you want of Larry, but SVN is nowhere near BK is term of > capabilities (and neither is arch for he matter). It's only better > compared to cvs, and then not by that much. first. what kind of advantages does bk have over other svn? Seriously. If Apache can use it, and gcc might use it (again two very large projects), what makes linux so differetnt that it can't. And I don't want _anything_ from Larry. I am just pointing out, that this kind of legal clause is more ridicolous than understandable. Last, why can you compare cvs to bk? and not subversion, or arch? arch and subversion are way superiour to cvs ... > SCM is hard and not sexy, I'm afraid. yes its hard, so we have to use bk with a very strange license? better close the eyes and not change. What do you think is kernel coding? Walk in the park? Do you think all those developers say, nah I better use Windows or Mac OS X, because its hard and not sexy ... pah ... BS! - -- [ Clemens Schwaighofer -----=====:::::~ ] [ TBWA\ && TEQUILA\ Japan IT Group ] [ 6-17-2 Ginza Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0061, JAPAN ] [ Tel: +81-(0)3-3545-7703 Fax: +81-(0)3-3545-7343 ] [ http://www.tequila.co.jp http://www.tbwajapan.co.jp ] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCE+FAjBz/yQjBxz8RAjgHAKDf03ccZzlYDaFcZtNyG5Do3pba0QCfQk31 R7mSvvgMI7IQ9C4/ahc0Hak= =L8t2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/