Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262205AbVBQD4O (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Feb 2005 22:56:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262206AbVBQD4N (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Feb 2005 22:56:13 -0500 Received: from inti.inf.utfsm.cl ([200.1.21.155]:26567 "EHLO inti.inf.utfsm.cl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262205AbVBQD4G (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Feb 2005 22:56:06 -0500 Message-Id: <200502170348.j1H3mVpV008827@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> To: Andrew Morton cc: Parag Warudkar , torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: -rc3 leaking NOT BIO [Was: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?] In-Reply-To: Message from Andrew Morton of "Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:51:42 -0800." <20050216155142.6840497f.akpm@osdl.org> X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4.2; nmh 1.0.4; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 17) Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 00:48:30 -0300 From: Horst von Brand Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 880 Lines: 22 Andrew Morton said: > Parag Warudkar wrote: [...] > > Is there a reason X86_64 doesnt have CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER anywhere in > > the .config? > No good reason, I suspect. Does x86_64 use up a (freeable) register for the frame pointer or not? I.e., does -fomit-frame-pointer have any effect on the generated code? -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/