Message-ID: <3174569B9743D511922F00A0C94314230808598A@TYANWEB>
From: YhLu <YhLu@tyan.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: node_to_cpumask  x86_64 broken
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 22:37:08 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 841
Lines: 26

Yes. should not use prink(ERR.... 

YH

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andi Kleen [mailto:ak@muc.de] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 10:22 PM
> To: YhLu
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: node_to_cpumask x86_64 broken
> 
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 10:30:51PM -0800, YhLu wrote:
> > forget about it. I found the reason:  I only put node 0 has 
> RAM installed.
> 
> There is some problem with this code - it complains on a few machines.
> However it's relatively harmless when this happens, so I 
> haven't looked it yet. Should perhaps take out the printk.
> 
> -Andi
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/