Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262179AbVBQIJo (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2005 03:09:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262253AbVBQIJo (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2005 03:09:44 -0500 Received: from nabe.tequila.jp ([211.14.136.221]:35515 "HELO nabe.tequila.jp") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262179AbVBQIJ1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2005 03:09:27 -0500 Message-ID: <42145128.4030202@tequila.co.jp> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:09:12 +0900 From: Clemens Schwaighofer Organization: TEQUILA\Japan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041220 Thunderbird/1.0 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roland Kuhn CC: Olivier Galibert , kernel@crazytrain.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed References: <20050214020802.GA3047@bitmover.com> <58cb370e05021404081e53f458@mail.gmail.com> <20050214150820.GA21961@optonline.net> <20050214154015.GA8075@bitmover.com> <7579f7fb0502141017f5738d1@mail.gmail.com> <20050214185624.GA16029@bitmover.com> <1108469967.3862.21.camel@crazytrain> <42131637.2070801@tequila.co.jp> <20050216154321.GB34621@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <4213E141.5040407@tequila.co.jp> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1604 Lines: 41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/17/2005 04:55 PM, Roland Kuhn wrote: > That said, it would of course be possible to improve the internal > workflow of our emperor penguin if he used subversion, but the > collaboration with others could not benefit the way it does with a > changeset-based approach. Question is then, what about keeping a main trunk with the vanialle release, and each dev has its own branch. now at a certain point you have to merge them. Now where is the difference between a central rep and a de-central one. At day X, patches from Andrew's tree have to go to Linus tree and from his tree into the new vanialla kernel. right? Somehow I can't see the difference here. > Linux kernel development is hard _and_ sexy :-) at least something :D - -- [ Clemens Schwaighofer -----=====:::::~ ] [ TBWA\ && TEQUILA\ Japan IT Group ] [ 6-17-2 Ginza Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0061, JAPAN ] [ Tel: +81-(0)3-3545-7703 Fax: +81-(0)3-3545-7343 ] [ http://www.tequila.co.jp http://www.tbwajapan.co.jp ] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCFFEojBz/yQjBxz8RAs5rAKC1i4RuDxyi3hjnRDfcjCYyRTGbNQCgsRgc ErnefDIDGimPjjXa8cALBQc= =lWQ8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/