Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261154AbVBQQ10 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:27:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262302AbVBQQ10 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:27:26 -0500 Received: from mail.enyo.de ([212.9.189.167]:57536 "EHLO mail.enyo.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261154AbVBQQ1X (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:27:23 -0500 From: Florian Weimer To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed References: <20050214020802.GA3047@bitmover.com> <200502142324.43269.gjury@inode.at> <20050214225704.GD16029@bitmover.com> <200502150029.15993.gjury@inode.at> <20050217000032.GG3865@elf.ucw.cz> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:27:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Geert Uytterhoeven's message of "Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:46:41 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: <87650r179z.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 818 Lines: 19 * Geert Uytterhoeven: >> Easy, start working for OSDL, then start hacking arch or >> whatever. Puff, you are his coworker, you are competing with Larry, >> Linus license goes away. > > I don't know whether the kernel hackers that work for IBM use the > `free' version of BK or not, but if they do, s/OSDL/IBM/ and > s/arch/ClearCase/ and there's a problem... No, there isn't. Bitmover can choose freely against whom they try to enforce their copyright licenses. Copyright law is not like trademark law. You can selectively enforce your rights without risking dilution. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/