Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261231AbVBQXQZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:16:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261208AbVBQXOM (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:14:12 -0500 Received: from 0.fe-0-0-0.c1.pfn.citynetwireless.net ([209.218.71.2]:17033 "EHLO core.citynetwireless.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261225AbVBQXNZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:13:25 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:13:04 -0600 From: parker@citynetwireless.net To: arjan@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Please open sysfs symbols to proprietary modules Message-ID: <20050217231304.GA18940@core.citynetwireless.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1104 Lines: 21 On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 09:41:00 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 17:56 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I'm writing a module under a proprietary license. I decided to use sysfs > > to do the configuration. Unfortunately, all sysfs exports are available > > to GPL modules only because they are exported by EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. > > I suggest you talk to a lawyer and review the general comments about > binary modules with him (http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/COPYING.modules > for example). You are writing an addition to linux from scratch, and it > is generally not considered OK to do that in binary form (I certainly do > not consider it OK). So what about companies like ImageStream who write proprietary Linux network drivers for their hardware from scratch with no previous ports from another OS? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/