Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261287AbVBRCgU (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:36:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261282AbVBRCgU (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:36:20 -0500 Received: from simmts7.bellnexxia.net ([206.47.199.165]:38346 "EHLO simmts7-srv.bellnexxia.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261261AbVBRCgP (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:36:15 -0500 Message-ID: <4089.10.10.10.24.1108694032.squirrel@linux1> In-Reply-To: <421551F5.5090005@tupshin.com> References: <20050214020802.GA3047@bitmover.com> <200502172105.25677.pmcfarland@downeast.net> <421551F5.5090005@tupshin.com> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:33:52 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [darcs-users] Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed From: "Sean" To: "Tupshin Harper" Cc: "Patrick McFarland" , lm@bitmover.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, darcs-users@darcs.net User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-7 X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1402 Lines: 36 On Thu, February 17, 2005 9:24 pm, Tupshin Harper said: Hi Tupshin, > Speaking as somebody that uses Darcs evey day, my opinion is that the > future of OSS SCM will be something like arch or darcs but that neither > are ready for projects the size of the linux kernel yet. Darcs is > definitely way too slow for really large projects (though great for > small to medium sized ones). Last I checked, Arch was still too slow in > some areas, though that might have changed in recent months. Also, many > people, me included, find the usability of arch to be from ideal. > > My hope and expectation is that Arch and Darcs will both improve their > performance, features, and usability and that in the not too distant > future both of them will be viable alternatives for large scale source > tree management. Falling into the same category probably is svk, although it's less mature than the options you cite. > The important thing for the health of the SCM ecosystem is that there be > ways to losslessly convert and interoperate between them as well as > between legacy/centralized systems such as CVS and SVN as well as with > BK. Amen. Thanks, Sean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/