Message-ID: <3923.10.10.10.24.1108711618.squirrel@linux1>
In-Reply-To: <20050218040010.GA6166@thunk.org>
References: <20050214020802.GA3047@bitmover.com>
    <4214CC9B.7090001@nortel.com>
    <3757.10.10.10.24.1108659538.squirrel@linux1>
    <200502171825.08631.tomlins@cam.org>
    <1742.10.10.10.24.1108683124.squirrel@linux1>
    <20050218040010.GA6166@thunk.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 02:26:58 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed
From: "Sean" <seanlkml@sympatico.ca>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: "Ed Tomlinson" <tomlins@cam.org>, "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@nortel.com>,
       "Lee Revell" <rlrevell@joe-job.com>, "d.c" <aradorlinux@yahoo.es>,
       cs@tequila.co.jp, galibert@pobox.com, kernel@crazytrain.com,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Importance: Normal
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 613
Lines: 20

On Thu, February 17, 2005 11:00 pm, Theodore Ts'o said:

> If you think that, you truly do not understand the value of BK, and
> why Linus chose it.

Hey Ted,

No, I just disagree that it was an absolute requirement or worth its cost
that so many want to completely discount.   Andrew has pretty much shown
BK is not required, he's still using patches.

Cheers,
Sean


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/