Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261309AbVBRIcb (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 03:32:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261305AbVBRIcb (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 03:32:31 -0500 Received: from ppp-217-133-42-200.cust-adsl.tiscali.it ([217.133.42.200]:32318 "EHLO opteron.random") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261301AbVBRIc2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 03:32:28 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:32:25 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: lm@bitmover.com, Jeff Sipek , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed Message-ID: <20050218083225.GY2071@opteron.random> References: <20050214020802.GA3047@bitmover.com> <58cb370e05021404081e53f458@mail.gmail.com> <20050214150820.GA21961@optonline.net> <20050214154015.GA8075@bitmover.com> <20050214194428.GC8763@merlin.emma.line.org> <20050214200544.GC16029@bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050214200544.GC16029@bitmover.com> X-AA-GPG-Key: 1024D/68B9CB43 13D9 8355 295F 4823 7C49 C012 DFA1 686E 68B9 CB43 X-Cpushare-GPG-Key: 1024D/4D11C21C 5F99 3C8B 5142 EB62 26C3 2325 8989 B72A 4D11 C21C X-Cpushare-SSL-SHA1-Cert: 3812 CD76 E482 94AF 020C 0FFA E1FF 559D 9B4F A59B X-Cpushare-SSL-MD5-Cert: EDA5 F2DA 1D32 7560 5E07 6C91 BFFC B885 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1617 Lines: 33 On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 12:05:44PM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote: > That's not how others are reading it and when we requested clarification > from the legal firm we use for contracts (Fenwick&West if you care) they > said that it could well be interpreted that if you use BK you are giving > up your right to hack on another system. That wasn't our intent but nor You know I'm not a lawyer but that's exactly the way I read it too: http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/10/25/224 http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/10/25/400 http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/10/25/249 I've been too harsh in the past on this, but the no time limit was unbearable to me, and finally some sanity showed up today and things become bearable for the first time ever as far as I'm concerned. Now it seems that many folks misunderstood the old licence if they're complaining about the licence change. Complaints about the new licence are a no sense as far as I can see. I'm only amazed you didn't clarify this earlier if your intention was really to allow hacking on other systems after a certain amount of time. You had ton of chances to clarify it before the layers lined things up, including in answer to the above messages. Anyway I don't care since a clarification by email wouldn't been enough as far as I was concerned, so I'm glad eventually the licence is changing. A big thanks to Fenwick&West from my part. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/