Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261320AbVBRJJT (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:09:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261313AbVBRJJS (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:09:18 -0500 Received: from ppp-217-133-42-200.cust-adsl.tiscali.it ([217.133.42.200]:34373 "EHLO opteron.random") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261305AbVBRJJE (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:09:04 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:09:00 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Tupshin Harper Cc: Patrick McFarland , lm@bitmover.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, darcs-users@darcs.net Subject: Re: [darcs-users] Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed Message-ID: <20050218090900.GA2071@opteron.random> References: <20050214020802.GA3047@bitmover.com> <200502172105.25677.pmcfarland@downeast.net> <421551F5.5090005@tupshin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <421551F5.5090005@tupshin.com> X-AA-GPG-Key: 1024D/68B9CB43 13D9 8355 295F 4823 7C49 C012 DFA1 686E 68B9 CB43 X-Cpushare-GPG-Key: 1024D/4D11C21C 5F99 3C8B 5142 EB62 26C3 2325 8989 B72A 4D11 C21C X-Cpushare-SSL-SHA1-Cert: 3812 CD76 E482 94AF 020C 0FFA E1FF 559D 9B4F A59B X-Cpushare-SSL-MD5-Cert: EDA5 F2DA 1D32 7560 5E07 6C91 BFFC B885 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1492 Lines: 27 On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 06:24:53PM -0800, Tupshin Harper wrote: > small to medium sized ones). Last I checked, Arch was still too slow in > some areas, though that might have changed in recent months. Also, many IMHO someone needs to rewrite ARCH using the RCS or SCCS format for the backend and a single file for the changesets and with sane parameters conventions miming SVN. The internal algorithms of arch seems the most advanced possible. It's just the interface and the fs backend that's so bad and doesn't compress in the backups either. SVN bsddb doesn't compress either by default, but at least the new fsfs compresses pretty well, not as good as CVS, but not as badly as bsddb and arch either. I may be completely wrong, so take the above just as a humble suggestion. darcs scares me a bit because it's in haskell, I don't believe very much in functional languages for compute intensive stuff, ram utilization skyrockets sometime (I wouldn't like to need >1G of ram to manage the tree). Other languages like python or perl are much slower than C/C++ too but at least ram utilization can be normally dominated to sane levels with them and they can be greatly optimized easily with C/C++ extensions of the performance critical parts. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/