Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261464AbVBRT0W (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:26:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261455AbVBRT0W (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:26:22 -0500 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.195]:1031 "EHLO rproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261453AbVBRT0U (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:26:20 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=UeZrmy4snhLBf63h1PgVvS9Z16M56GFx46f2BJWkD+YuZXB7AvKiTgBv/EBGx4qc5rSf7Ve8G9G3Zy+YzlTCpeBAsrf18T68Ci8edTXqOCuBM4YsL1VP3Axb5KZx65h0Go1VUDY9B9gsDmz2cIW5RSWFue7OJxQDVUcxWjVLc2I= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:26:18 -0500 From: Dmitry Torokhov Reply-To: dtor_core@ameritech.net To: Sean Subject: Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" , Horst von Brand , Chris Friesen , "d.c" , cs@tequila.co.jp, galibert@pobox.com, kernel@crazytrain.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <4075.10.10.10.24.1108751663.squirrel@linux1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <4912.10.10.10.24.1108675441.squirrel@linux1> <200502180142.j1I1gJXC007648@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> <1451.10.10.10.24.1108713140.squirrel@linux1> <20050218162729.GA5839@thunk.org> <4075.10.10.10.24.1108751663.squirrel@linux1> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1156 Lines: 27 On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:34:23 -0500 (EST), Sean wrote: > On Fri, February 18, 2005 11:27 am, Theodore Ts'o said: > > > If you truly believe that BK would be able to add the value that it > > does to the kernel development process by using some other SCM as the > > master SCM, with BK being "underneath", as you proposed earlier, then > > you do not understand why BK is fundamentally better than the current > > open source SCM systems that are out there. > > BK already feeds patches out at the head, surely if it's as powerful as > you think, it could feed a free SCM too for your non-bk friends in the > community. What is bk2cvs gateway that is maintained by Larry then? Just call it your "head" that Linus feeds from his BK repository and you are all set. I can see that Roman and Stellian want something different, but we alerady have what you have just described. -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/