Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261475AbVBRTwf (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:52:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261452AbVBRTwe (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:52:34 -0500 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.196]:5740 "EHLO rproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261468AbVBRTtc (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:49:32 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=gQKnFIGwalKmLrOfF51uuN6q0AvAqZFNM2URG0kA54t5E60IKg0E2VKNe5+8LrXwRd6zET+NbnHIjuo0ioB1p+qSPIlJmE/4uddVtvmHbLq+oLKDR4oF8gDe1f9goMNf3Giwk25LPIAiq8UDG2RHRS/AuT8fdor3InmFIWy1v7U= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:49:28 -0500 From: Dmitry Torokhov Reply-To: dtor_core@ameritech.net To: Sean Subject: Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" , Horst von Brand , Chris Friesen , "d.c" , cs@tequila.co.jp, galibert@pobox.com, kernel@crazytrain.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3369.10.10.10.24.1108755080.squirrel@linux1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <4912.10.10.10.24.1108675441.squirrel@linux1> <200502180142.j1I1gJXC007648@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> <1451.10.10.10.24.1108713140.squirrel@linux1> <20050218162729.GA5839@thunk.org> <4075.10.10.10.24.1108751663.squirrel@linux1> <3369.10.10.10.24.1108755080.squirrel@linux1> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1194 Lines: 31 On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:31:20 -0500 (EST), Sean wrote: > On Fri, February 18, 2005 2:26 pm, Dmitry Torokhov said: > > > What is bk2cvs gateway that is maintained by Larry then? Just call it > > your "head" that Linus feeds from his BK repository and you are all > > set. > > > > I can see that Roman and Stellian want something different, but we > > alerady have what you have just described. > > > > Bitkeeper isn't motivated to raise the bar in terms of implementation, nor > is cvs the best choice in terms of which free tool to use. You from cvs you can import into other SCM of your choise. > Once a free > SCM is actually used at the head, there are opportunities to implement > updating too, not just pulling. Heh, you don't get to update the master repository even if you are using BK. And you are free to update your local tree with CVS/SVN/whatever. So I am not sure why you trying this argument. -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/