Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261521AbVBRVfD (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:35:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261514AbVBRVeh (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:34:37 -0500 Received: from bender.bawue.de ([193.7.176.20]:53730 "EHLO bender.bawue.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261528AbVBRVdj (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:33:39 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 22:33:32 +0100 From: Joerg Sommrey To: Linux kernel mailing list Subject: Question on CONFIG_IRQBALANCE / 2.6.x Message-ID: <20050218213332.GA13485@sommrey.de> Mail-Followup-To: Joerg Sommrey , Linux kernel mailing list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 701 Lines: 20 Hi all, there's something I don't understand: With IRQBALANCE *enabled* almost all interrupts are processed on CPU0. This changed in an unexpected way after disabling IRQBALANCE: now all interrupts are distributed uniformly to both CPUs. Maybe it's intentional, but it's not what I expect when a config option named IRQBALANCE is *disabled*. Can anybody comment on this? Thanks, -jo -- -rw-r--r-- 1 jo users 63 2005-02-18 21:21 /home/jo/.signature - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/